Forstmann v. Schulting

New York Court of Appeals
Forstmann v. Schulting, 1 Silv. Ct. App. 521 (N.Y. 1887)
11 N.Y. St. Rep. 763
Memoranda

Forstmann v. Schulting

Opinion of the Court

Memoranda.

The notice of the order and its entry did

not show by indorsement or otherwise the office address or place of business of the attorney serving it, and was therefore ineffectual to limit the time of appeal. Kelly v. Sheehan, 76 N. Y. 325; Bockes v. Hathorn, 78 id. 222.

The motion to dismiss the appeal should therefore be denied, but without costs.

Reference

Full Case Name
Julius Forstmann v. Ruth A. Schulting, Administratrix
Status
Published