New York Court of Appeals, 1887

Forstmann v. Schulting

Forstmann v. Schulting
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 25, 1887 · Memoranda
1 Silv. Ct. App. 521; 11 N.Y. St. Rep. 763

Forstmann v. Schulting

Opinion of the Court

Memoranda.

The notice of the order and its entry did

not show by indorsement or otherwise the office address or place of business of the attorney serving it, and was therefore ineffectual to limit the time of appeal. Kelly v. Sheehan, 76 N. Y. 325; Bockes v. Hathorn, 78 id. 222.

The motion to dismiss the appeal should therefore be denied, but without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.