New York Court of Appeals, 1887

Smith v. Van Antwerp

Smith v. Van Antwerp
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 2, 1887
6 N.Y. St. Rep. 863

Smith v. Van Antwerp

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The evidence which in general language was given on the trial, supported the judgment from which the appeal has been taken. If the plaintiff desired more specific or further information as to the incumbrances and loans upon the property, it was his duty to prosecute the inquiry. Having failed to do so, he cannot, because of that failure, object to the propriety of the judgment.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.