New York Court of Appeals, 1889

Maicas v. . Leony

New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 19, 1889 · Earl

20 N.E. 586; 113 N.Y. 619; 68 Sickels 619; 1889 N.Y. LEXIS 990 (North Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Esek Cowen for appellant. A.J. Dittenhoefer for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

*622 Earl, J.,

reads for affirmance of order of General Term, which affirmed order of Special Term denying defendant’s motion for the appointment of a referee to take and state the accounts, and for affirmance of the other order of General Term and the order of Special Term affirmed by it so far as they vacate and set aside the report of the referee and the interlocutory judgment, and for reversal of the said orders in other respects, so that the case may stand for further trial before the referee.

All concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.