Swift v. . Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad Company
Cases that cite this one
48 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Wilhelm v. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. (Okla. 1915)
- Betancourt v. Wilson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1957)
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. McCleary (Okla. 1935)
- Julian v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. (Okla. 1934)
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Nail (Okla. 1932)
- Morser v. Southern Pacific Co. (Or. 1927)
- New York, N. H. & H. R. v. Kmetz (2d Cir. 1912)
- Michaels v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad (Wis. 1911)
- Kunkel v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. (N.D. 1909)
- Glaria v. Washington Southern Railway Co. (D.C. Cir. 1908)
- Edwards v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. (S.D. 1907)
- McDonald v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1903)
- Meneo v. Central Railroad Co. of New Jersey (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 1903)
- Schreiner v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1896)
- Krenzer v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. (Ind. 1896)
- Schmidt v. Cook (New York Court of Common Pleas 1895)
- Larkin v. New York & N. R. (New York Court of Common Pleas 1892)
- Carpino v. Baker (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1979)
- Comstock v. United States (District Court, D. Maryland 1953)
- Burd v. Bleischer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1924)
- Burke v. Maryland, Delaware & Virginia Railway Co. (Md. 1919)
- Johnston v. Delano (Iowa 1915)
- Schoonover v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad (W. Va. 1911)
- Schmidt v. Pennsylvania R. R. (3d Cir. 1910)
- Smetanka v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1908)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 647
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 648
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 649
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 650 O'BRIEN, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except PECKHAM and GRAY, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.