Fithian v. Wheeler
New York Court of Appeals
Fithian v. Wheeler, 125 N.Y. 696 (N.Y. 1890)
Brien
Fithian v. Wheeler
Opinion of the Court
The following is an extract from the mem. of opinion :
“The questions involved are the constitutionality of the above statute and the validity of the sales thereunder. These questions have been, determined in this court in recent cases adverse to the defendants. (Terrel v. Wheeler, 123 N. Y. 76; Lamb v. Connolly and Lamb v. Lancy, 122 id. 531.)
“The judgment in all the cases should, therefore, be affirmed.”
reads for affirmance.
Judgments affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- David A. Fithian v. George S. Wheeler, as etc., Appellants Same v. Same John O'Brien v. Patrick Harden, Appellant John H. Martenhoff v. George W. Bird, Appellants Michael H. Haggerty v. George S. Wheeler, as etc., Appellant Hugh D. Kelly v. George S. Wheeler, Appellants Adam Lamb v. John Cahill, Appellant Adam Lamb v. John McCamphill, Appellant Adam Lamb v. John Boehm, Appellant Ira O. Miller v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant Ira O. Miller v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant Ira O. Miller v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant Ira O. Miller v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant Ira O. Miller v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant Ira O. Miller v. Nancy B. Wheeler, Impleaded, etc., Appellant Harry Wallerstein v. John Bohanna
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published