Wynn v. . Central Park, North and East River Railroad Co.
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- Caristo v. Sanzone (N.Y. 2001)
- Gentry v. Davis (Kan. 1923)
- Nissly v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago Railway Co. (Mich. 1911)
- Brumberger v. Joline (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 1910)
- Adams v. Union Railway Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1903)
- Goodell v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1901)
- Raolaslovic v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co. (N.Y. 1927)
- Van Dusen v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1920)
- Maguire v. . Barrett (N.Y. 1918)
- Van Ingen v. Jewish Hospital (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1918)
- Dwyer v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1909)
- Adams v. Union Railway Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1903)
- Illinois Central R. R. v. Schmitt (Ill. App. Ct. 1902)
- Kantrowitz v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1901)
- Getman v. . Delaware, L. W.R.R. Co. (N.Y. 1900)
- Getman v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad (N.Y. 1900)
- Wanzer v. Chippewa Valley Electric Railroad (Wis. 1900)
- Stabenau v. . Atlantic Ave. R.R. Co. (N.Y. 1898)
- Piehl v. Albany Railway (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1897)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 577
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 578
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 579 PECKHAM, J., reads for reversal.
All concur, except GRAY, J., not voting.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.