McNamara v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- Mischke v. City of Seattle (Wash. 1901)
- Elias v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co. (N.Y. 1919)
- Brender v. New York, Ontario and Western Railway Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1919)
- Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Alcorn (Tex. App. 1915)
- Cranch v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1905)
- Henavie v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. (N.Y. 1901)
- Winn v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1901)
- Henavie v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (N.Y. 1901)
- Winn v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1901)
- Whalen v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1899)
- Manley v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1897)
- Mixsell v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad (New York Supreme Court 1897)
- Wilber v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1896)
- Manley v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (New York Supreme Court 1896)
- Wilbur v. Delaware, L. & W. Railroad (New York Supreme Court 1895)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 652
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 653
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 654 O'BRIEN, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur, except GRAY, J., not sitting.
Order reversed and judgment on verdict affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.