New York Court of Appeals, 1892

Coursey v. . Morton

Coursey v. . Morton
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 15, 1892
30 N.E. 866; 132 N.Y. 556; 1892 N.Y. LEXIS 1246 (North Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Louis Marshall for appellants. Geo. Barrow, Goodelle Nottingham and Waters McLennan for respondents.

Coursey v. . Morton

Opinion of the Court

Haight, J., reads for reversal.

All concur, except Bradley, Yanw and Bbowh, JJ., dissenting, who were of the opinion that, while the General Term might, with great propriety, have reversed the judgment upon the ground that the findings of the referee were opposed to the weight of evidence, still, as there was some evidence to support the referee’s conclusion, this court could not interfere.

Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.