New York Court of Appeals, 1899

Blake v. . Clausen

Blake v. . Clausen
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 24, 1899 · <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.
53 N.E. 1129; 158 N.Y. 727; 1899 N.Y. LEXIS 834 (North Eastern Reporter)

Blake v. . Clausen

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We think the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. There was no valid renewal of the note in question on the 28th day of October, 1887. (Olmstead v. Latimer, 158 N. Y. 313, and authorities there cited.)

Upon the other questions involved we call attention to, the cases of Chapman v. Lynch (156 N. Y. 551) and Close v. Potter (155 N. Y. 145, 156).

All concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.