Koehne v. . New York and Queens County Railway Company
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- O'Brien v. New York Railways Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1919)
- Hiller v. Johnson (Wis. 1916)
- Conway v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1903)
- Conway v. Brooklyn Heights R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1903)
- Beiner v. Nassau Electric Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1920)
- Hubner v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1902)
- Leonard v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1901)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This appeal cannot be sustained upon the theory that the previously existing law as to the degree of care required of carriers to insure the safety of their passengers has been changed by the decision in Stierle v. U. Ry. Co. (156 N. Y. 70, 684), for no such change was made or intended, as is manifest from the opinion delivered upon the motion for a reargument, where this court plainly declared that the decision in that case was not intended to, and did not, effect any such change, and as there are no other errors which would justify a reversal the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Vann and Werner, JJ., concur; Cullen, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.