New York Court of Appeals, 1900

Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Company

Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Company
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 9, 1900
58 N.E. 1092; 164 N.Y. 566 (North Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Abraham Levy for motion. George Putzel opposed.

Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Company

Opinion of the Court

The motion is to vacate allowance of an appeal made ex parte, by a judge of this court, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries, from a judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division which had refused to certify that in its opinion a question of law is involved which ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. The allowance of the appeal is not reviewable; the application for the allowance could be made ex parte.

The motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.