McKim v. . Manhattan Railway Company
McKim v. . Manhattan Railway Company
55 N.E. 1097; 161 N.Y. 638; 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1484
(North Eastern Reporter)
McKim v. . Manhattan Railway Company
Opinion of the Court
These two appeals involve the same questions which were raised in the Kernochan Case (161 N. Y. 339), decided at the present term, and the judgments should be affirmed upon the opinion in that case, with costs.
All concur, except Parker, Oh. J., not sitting, and O’Brien, J., dissenting.
' affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.