New York Court of Appeals, 1902

Smith v. . Kingston City Railroad Company

New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 31, 1902 · <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.

62 N.E. 1100; 169 N.Y. 616 (North Eastern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

P. N. Gray & Co. v. Cavalliotis (District Court, E.D. New York 1921)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We think that the case was properly submitted to the jury upon both theories of. negligence on the *617 part of the defendant, the one relating to improper construction and the other to negligent operation of the car.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Parker, Oh. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.