New York Court of Appeals, 1906

Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works

Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 6, 1906
76 N.E. 1116; 184 N.Y. 519; 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1395 (North Eastern Reporter)
Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of Woodward, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien and Edward T. Bartlett, JJ.; Werner, J., concurs in result on the ground that the structure in cpiestion was a scaffold, but not com-'pleted, and that plaintiff’s participation in the erection thereof precluded his recovery. Dissenting: Hiscock and Chase, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.