Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works

New York Court of Appeals
Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works, 76 N.E. 1116 (N.Y. 1906)
184 N.Y. 519; 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1395

Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works

Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of Woodward, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien and Edward T. Bartlett, JJ.; Werner, J., concurs in result on the ground that the structure in cpiestion was a scaffold, but not com-'pleted, and that plaintiff’s participation in the erection thereof precluded his recovery. Dissenting: Hiscock and Chase, JJ.

Reference

Full Case Name
Joseph Welk, Respondent, v. Jackson Architectural Iron Works, Appellant, Impleaded With Another
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published