New York Court of Appeals, 1906

Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works

Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 6, 1906
76 N.E. 1116; 184 N.Y. 519; 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1395 (North Eastern Reporter)

Welk v. . Jackson Architectural Iron Works

Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of Woodward, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien and Edward T. Bartlett, JJ.; Werner, J., concurs in result on the ground that the structure in cpiestion was a scaffold, but not com-'pleted, and that plaintiff’s participation in the erection thereof precluded his recovery. Dissenting: Hiscock and Chase, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.