Lapieduse v. . Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company
Lapieduse v. . Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company
80 N.E. 1112; 187 N.Y. 561; 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 884
(North Eastern Reporter)
Lapieduse v. . Syracuse Rapid Transit Railway Company
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J.; Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur on the ground that the alleged errors were so cured by the subsequent charge as to become harmless; Gray and Willard Bartlett, JJ., dissent upon the ground that it was error to leave the case with the jury upon the. instruction that there was a legal presumption that the plaintiff was not mi juris.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.