New York Court of Appeals, 1908

Putnam v. . Lincoln Safe Deposit Company

Putnam v. . Lincoln Safe Deposit Company
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 13, 1908
85 N.E. 1115; 191 N.Y. 542; 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 1165 (North Eastern Reporter)

Putnam v. . Lincoln Safe Deposit Company

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur. (See 191 N. Y. 166.)

Motion granted and remittitur amended so as to read: Interlocutory judgment affirmed, judgment of the Appellate Division, so far as it modified and affirmed the final judgment, reversed and a new trial ordered pursuant to the interlocutory judgment, before the court or before another referee as the court below shall determine; costs to abide the final award of costs.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.