Goggin v. . Manhattan Railway Company
Goggin v. . Manhattan Railway Company
89 N.E. 1100; 196 N.Y. 500; 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1460
(North Eastern Reporter)
Opinion of the Court
Order of Appellate Division reversed and judgment of Special Term affirmed, with costs in both courts, on dissenting opinion of Houghton, J., below.
Concur: Cullen, Ch.' J., Gray, Haigi-it, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Edward T. Bartlett, J.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.