Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Court of Appeals, 1910

Schwartz v. . Rehfuss

Schwartz v. . Rehfuss
New York Court of Appeals · Decided April 26, 1910 · Cullen, Gray, Werner, Bartlett, Iiiscock, Chase, Ifeston, Tomfkins
92 N.E. 1101; 198 N.Y. 585; 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 959 (North Eastern Reporter)

Schwartz v. . Rehfuss

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, IIiscock and Chase, JJ. Dissenting, on the authority of Stohes v. IFeston (142 N. Y. 433) and Matter of Tomfkins (154 N. Y. 634): Edward T. Bartlett, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑