Bandel v. . the City of New York
Bandel v. . the City of New York
98 N.E. 1097; 204 N.Y. 683; 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 935
(North Eastern Reporter)
Bandel v. . the City of New York
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Culler, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner and Collin, JJ.; Hiscock, J., concurs on the ground that plaintiff having been licensed to practice osteopathy under the provisions of section 14 of chapter 344 of the Laws of 1907, and not in accordance with the last clause of subdivision 6 of section 7 of said act and related pro *684 visions, is not in position to claim that the ordinance in question is arbitrarily and unreasonably discriminating. Concurs: Vann, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.