New York Court of Appeals, 1912

Bandel v. . the City of New York

Bandel v. . the City of New York
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 8, 1912
98 N.E. 1097; 204 N.Y. 683; 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 935 (North Eastern Reporter)

Bandel v. . the City of New York

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Culler, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner and Collin, JJ.; Hiscock, J., concurs on the ground that plaintiff having been licensed to practice osteopathy under the provisions of section 14 of chapter 344 of the Laws of 1907, and not in accordance with the last clause of subdivision 6 of section 7 of said act and related pro *684 visions, is not in position to claim that the ordinance in question is arbitrarily and unreasonably discriminating. Concurs: Vann, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.