Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
98 N.E. 1103; 205 N.Y. 617; 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1380
(North Eastern Reporter)
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Seward Park Housing Corp. v. Cohen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Gropp v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1913)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that the amendment of the complaint allowed by the trial court introduced a new and different cause of action, as to which this court concurs in the dissenting opinion of Ingraham, P. J., below; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.