Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Court of Appeals, 1915

City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 25, 1915
108 N.E. 1091; 214 N.Y. 644; 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1331 (North Eastern Reporter)

City of Corning v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

*645 Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan and Miller, JJ. Dissenting: Seabury, J., on the ground that the entire structure between the two stone abutments constituted the framework of the bridge within the meaning of the statute.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑