Heim v. . McCall
Heim v. . McCall
108 N.E. 1106; 214 N.Y. 629; 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1305
(North Eastern Reporter)
Heim v. . McCall
Opinion of the Court
Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and that of Special' Term affirmed, with costs in all courts. (See People v. Crane, 214 N. Y. 154.)
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Miller, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ. Dissenting: Collin, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.