Weidmann v. . Borden
Weidmann v. . Borden
114 N.E. 1075; 219 N.Y. 611; 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 946
(North Eastern Reporter)
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozc and Pound, JJ.; Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., is of the opinion that the evidence as to the value was inadmissible, and he concurs upon the ground that the error was not harmful under the circumstances.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.