New York Court of Appeals, 1916

Weidmann v. . Borden

Weidmann v. . Borden
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 21, 1916
114 N.E. 1075; 219 N.Y. 611; 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 946 (North Eastern Reporter)
Weidmann v. . Borden

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozc and Pound, JJ.; Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., is of the opinion that the evidence as to the value was inadmissible, and he concurs upon the ground that the error was not harmful under the circumstances.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.