New York Court of Appeals, 1916

Saul v. . Barse

Saul v. . Barse
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 13, 1916
113 N.E. 1063; 218 N.Y. 719; 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1233 (North Eastern Reporter)

Saul v. . Barse

Opinion of the Court

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars ■ costs. Motion to amend remittitur granted and remittitur amended by adding thereto: “ The appellant argued in this court that the action should have been dismissed for want of jurisdiction as brought in derogation of the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal court in the receivership action of Morehead v. Strycker to liquidate the syndicate affairs.” (See 218 N. Y. 631.) .

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.