New York Court of Appeals, 1916

Reilly v. . Simonson

Reilly v. . Simonson
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 4, 1916 · <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.
111 N.E. 753; 217 N.Y. 636; 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1392 (North Eastern Reporter)

Reilly v. . Simonson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The appellant presents for our consideration a doubtful and serious question which we are unable to determine, for the reason that the form of the order does not enable us to assume jurisdiction. (Caponigri v. Altieri, 164 N. Y. 476; Wright v. Smith, 209 N. Y. 249.)

The appeal must be dismissed, with costs.

Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.