New York Court of Appeals, 1916

Di Tommaso v. . Syracuse University

New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 2, 1916

112 N.E. 1072; 218 N.Y. 640; 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1137 (North Eastern Reporter)

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; first and second questions certified answered in the negative; remaining questions not answered; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch: J., Hiscooic, Collin, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Cuddeback and Hogan, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.