Lumb v. . Lumb
Lumb v. . Lumb
112 N.E. 1064; 217 N.Y. 671; 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1444
(North Eastern Reporter)
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
Concur: Collin, Cuddeback, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase and Cardozo, JJ.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.