New York Court of Appeals, 1916

Lumb v. . Lumb

Lumb v. . Lumb
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 7, 1916
112 N.E. 1064; 217 N.Y. 671; 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1444 (North Eastern Reporter)
Lumb v. . Lumb

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Collin, Cuddeback, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase and Cardozo, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.