New York Court of Appeals, 1916

Fairclough v. . Southern Pacific Company

Fairclough v. . Southern Pacific Company
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 28, 1916
114 N.E. 1066; 219 N.Y. 657; 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1005 (North Eastern Reporter)

Fairclough v. . Southern Pacific Company

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs,' on the authority of Robinson v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. (112 N. Y. 315.)

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscook, Collin and Hogan, JJ.; Chase and Cardozo, JJ., dissent on the ground that the amended Code section is retroactive.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.