New York Court of Appeals, 1916

Fairclough v. . Southern Pacific Company

Fairclough v. . Southern Pacific Company
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 28, 1916
114 N.E. 1066; 219 N.Y. 657; 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1005 (North Eastern Reporter)
Fairclough v. . Southern Pacific Company

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs,' on the authority of Robinson v. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. (112 N. Y. 315.)

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscook, Collin and Hogan, JJ.; Chase and Cardozo, JJ., dissent on the ground that the amended Code section is retroactive.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.