New York Court of Appeals, 1916

Matter of Hawes

New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 18, 1916 · <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.

111 N.E. 211; 217 N.Y. 602; 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 1352 (North Eastern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Axtell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1932)
In re Kelly (N.Y. 1968)
In re Greenfield (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1965)
Matter of Axtell (N.Y. 1931)
In re Maisel (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1930)
In re Proceedings to Disbar Bevans (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1929)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order should be affirmed upon the

ground that there is some evidence to support the charges, and that questions relating to the comparative weight of evidence or the fairness of the sentence, whatever may be our views about them, are beyond our jurisdiction (Matter of Flannery, 212 N. Y. 610).

Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.