Nodwell v. . New York Railways Company

New York Court of Appeals
Nodwell v. . New York Railways Company, 126 N.E. 916 (N.Y. 1920)
228 N.Y. 547; 1920 N.Y. LEXIS 1004
<italic>Per Curiam</italic>.

Nodwell v. . New York Railways Company

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We think that in the absence of evidence of the layout of the tracks and the nature of the curve, if any, along which the defendant’s car was approaching, the plaintiff failed to establish her freedom from contributory negligence.

*548 The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Pound and Crane, JJ., concur; Cardozo and Andrews, JJ., not voting.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Reference

Full Case Name
Margaret Nodwell, Respondent, v. New York Railways Company, Appellant
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published