New York Court of Appeals, 1921

Holbrook v. . Holbrook

New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 1, 1921

130 N.E. 909; 230 N.Y. 600; 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 879 (North Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Henry F. Miller for appellant. Edward S. Kaufman and Alexander B. Halliday for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound and McLaughlin, JJ. Dissenting: Hogan, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.