People v. . Holzman

New York Court of Appeals
People v. . Holzman, 134 N.E. 569 (N.Y. 1921)
232 N.Y. 553; 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 585
<italic>Per Curiam</italic>.

People v. . Holzman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The record in this case fails to disclose facts sufficient to justify a conclusion that the defendant made or had in his possession tools under circumstances evincing an intent to use or employ, or allow the same to *554 be used or employed, in the commission of a crime, or that he had knowledge that the said tools were intended to be' so used. " '

The judgments should be reversed and a new .trial granted. - .

His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur - Pound, J.,-absent. Judgments reversed, etc.

Reference

Full Case Name
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Holzman, Appellant
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published