New York Court of Appeals, 1921

People v. . Holzman

People v. . Holzman
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 13, 1921 · <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.
134 N.E. 569; 232 N.Y. 553; 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 585 (North Eastern Reporter)

People v. . Holzman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The record in this case fails to disclose facts sufficient to justify a conclusion that the defendant made or had in his possession tools under circumstances evincing an intent to use or employ, or allow the same to *554 be used or employed, in the commission of a crime, or that he had knowledge that the said tools were intended to be' so used. " '

The judgments should be reversed and a new .trial granted. - .

His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur - Pound, J.,-absent. Judgments reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.