New York Court of Appeals, 1921

Jacob Youngs, Incorporated v. . Kent

Jacob Youngs, Incorporated v. . Kent
New York Court of Appeals · Decided March 8, 1921 · <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.
130 N.E. 933; 230 N.Y. 656; 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 920 (North Eastern Reporter)

Jacob Youngs, Incorporated v. . Kent

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The court did not overlook the specification which provides that defective work shall be replaced. The promise to replace, • like the promise to *657 install, is to be viewed, not as a condition, but as independent and collateral, when the defect is trivial and innocent. The law does not nullify the covenant, but restricts the remedy to damages.

The motion for a re-argument should be denied.

His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Motion denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.