New York Court of Appeals, 1921

People v. . Florina

People v. . Florina
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 6, 1921 · <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.
134 N.E. 565; 232 N.Y. 545; 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 576 (North Eastern Reporter)

People v. . Florina

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In view of the contradictions and uncertainties in the narratives of the witnesses for the prosecution, we think the ends of justice will be promoted if another jury is given the opportunity to determine the defendants’ guilt or innocence.

.The judgment of conviction should be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur; Pound, J., absent.

Judgment of conviction reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.