New York Court of Appeals, 1921

People v. . Florina

People v. . Florina
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 6, 1921 · <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.
134 N.E. 565; 232 N.Y. 545; 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 576 (North Eastern Reporter)
People v. . Florina

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In view of the contradictions and uncertainties in the narratives of the witnesses for the prosecution, we think the ends of justice will be promoted if another jury is given the opportunity to determine the defendants’ guilt or innocence.

.The judgment of conviction should be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur; Pound, J., absent.

Judgment of conviction reversed, etc.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.