New York Court of Appeals, 1922

Gonzales v. . Reichenthaler

Gonzales v. . Reichenthaler
New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 2, 1922
135 N.E. 938; 233 N.Y. 607; 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1028 (North Eastern Reporter)

Counsel

Samuel Abrahams and Jerome A. Strauss for appellant. Charles E. McMahon and George B. Hayes for respondent.

Gonzales v. . Reichenthaler

Opinion of the Court

*609 Order affirmed, with costs; first and second questions certified not answered; third question answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cabdozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.