U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines

New York Court of Appeals
U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines, 142 N.E. 270 (N.Y. 1923)
236 N.Y. 528; 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 947
Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews

U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines

Opinion of the Court

Order affirming order denying motion to vacate service of summons affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. Order affirming order granting motion to amend summons affirmed, without costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not voting: His cock, Ch. J.

Reference

Full Case Name
U. T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company, Respondent, v. Walker B. Hines, as Director-General of the United States Railroad Administration, Appellant
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published