Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Court of Appeals, 1923

U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines

U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines
New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 8, 1923 · Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews
142 N.E. 270; 236 N.Y. 528; 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 947 (North Eastern Reporter)

U.T. Hungerford Brass and Copper Company v. . Hines

Opinion of the Court

Order affirming order denying motion to vacate service of summons affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. Order affirming order granting motion to amend summons affirmed, without costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not voting: His cock, Ch. J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑