Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank

New York Court of Appeals
Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank, 138 N.E. 497 (N.Y. 1923)
235 N.Y. 37; 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1147
<italic>Per Curiam</italic>.

Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank

Opinion of the Court

*39 Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Held: In an action properly brought in the courts of this state by a citizen or an alien to recover damages, liquidated or unliquidated, for breach of contract or for a tort, where primarily the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum expressed in foreign money, in determining the amount of the judgment expressed in our currency the rate of exchange prevailing at the date of the breach of contract or at the date of the commission of the tort is under ordinary circumstances to be applied. (Gross v. Mendel, 171 App. Div. 237; affd., 225 N. Y. 633.)

His cock, Ch. J.', Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Olga I. Hoppe, Respondent, v. Russo-Asiatic Bank, Appellant
Cited By
54 cases
Status
Published