Hoppe v. . Russo-Asiatic Bank
Cases that cite this one
51 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Shaw, Savill, Albion & Co., Ltd. v. The Fredericksburg. The Tamaroa (2d Cir. 1951)
- Richard v. American Union Bank (N.Y. 1925)
- John S. Metcalf Co. v. Mayer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1925)
- Auerbach v. Barrett (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1925)
- Teca-Print A.G. v. Amacoil Machinery, Inc. (New York Supreme Court 1988)
- Competex, S.A. (In Liquidation) v. Ronald Labow (2d Cir. 1986)
- Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank (2d Cir. 1985)
- Newmont Mines Ltd. v. Adriatic Insurance (District Court, S.D. New York 1985)
- Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank N.A. (2d Cir. 1985)
- Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank (2d Cir. 1981)
- Vishipco Line v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. (2d Cir. 1981)
- Meinrath v. Singer Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1980)
- Hughes Tool Co. v. United Artists Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1952)
- In re the Arbitration between United Shellac Corp. & A. M. Jordan Ltd. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1950)
- Richard v. National City Bank (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1931)
- Kantor v. Aristo Hosiery Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1928)
- Deutsche Bank Filiale Nurnberg v. Humphrey (Supreme Court of the United States 1926)
- Miller v. Humphrey (9th Cir. 1925)
- Dante v. Miniggio (D.C. Cir. 1924)
- Guiness v. Miller (2d Cir. 1924)
- Guinness v. Miller (District Court, S.D. New York 1923)
- Kaiser Aluminum Warrick, LLC v. US Magnesium LLC (District Court, S.D. New York 2025)
- Just In-Material Designs, Ltd. v. I.T.A.D. Associates, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Oppenheimer v. Dresdner Bank A. G. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1975)
- J. M. Rodriguez & Co. v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. (N.Y. 1973)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.
Held: In an action properly brought in the courts of this state by a citizen or an alien to recover damages, liquidated or unliquidated, for breach of contract or for a tort, where primarily the plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum expressed in foreign money, in determining the amount of the judgment expressed in our currency the rate of exchange prevailing at the date of the breach of contract or at the date of the commission of the tort is under ordinary circumstances to be applied. (Gross v. Mendel, 171 App. Div. 237; affd., 225 N. Y. 633.)
His cock, Ch. J.', Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.