Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore

New York Court of Appeals
Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore, 139 N.E. 723 (N.Y. 1923)
235 N.Y. 533; 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1248
<italic>Per Curiam</italic>.

Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We think the defendant has been improperly credited with payments made before September 7, 1909, to sub-brokers employed by plaintiff’s firm, and also for the firm’s office expenses.

The plaintiff’s recovery should, therefore, be increased by adding thereto the sum of $1,120.14.

As so modified, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs to either party as against the other.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Reference

Full Case Name
Hulbert T. E. Beardsley, Respondent and Appellant, v. American Bonding Company of Baltimore, Appellant and Respondent
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published