New York Court of Appeals, 1923

Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore

Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 27, 1923 · <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.
139 N.E. 723; 235 N.Y. 533; 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1248 (North Eastern Reporter)
Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We think the defendant has been improperly credited with payments made before September 7, 1909, to sub-brokers employed by plaintiff’s firm, and also for the firm’s office expenses.

The plaintiff’s recovery should, therefore, be increased by adding thereto the sum of $1,120.14.

As so modified, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs to either party as against the other.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.