Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore
Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore
139 N.E. 723; 235 N.Y. 533; 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1248
(North Eastern Reporter)
Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore
Opinion of the Court
We think the defendant has been improperly credited with payments made before September 7, 1909, to sub-brokers employed by plaintiff’s firm, and also for the firm’s office expenses.
The plaintiff’s recovery should, therefore, be increased by adding thereto the sum of $1,120.14.
As so modified, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs to either party as against the other.
Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.