New York Court of Appeals, 1923

Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore

Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore
New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 27, 1923 · <italic>Per Curiam</italic>.
139 N.E. 723; 235 N.Y. 533; 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1248 (North Eastern Reporter)

Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We think the defendant has been improperly credited with payments made before September 7, 1909, to sub-brokers employed by plaintiff’s firm, and also for the firm’s office expenses.

The plaintiff’s recovery should, therefore, be increased by adding thereto the sum of $1,120.14.

As so modified, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs to either party as against the other.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.