New York Court of Appeals, 1924

Village of Larchmont v. Town of Mamaroneck

New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 25, 1924 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>

147 N.E. 191; 239 N.Y. 551; 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 570 (North Eastern Reporter)

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

County of Westchester v. Village of Mamaroneck (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1964)
County of Westchester v. Village of Mamaroneck (New York Supreme Court 1964)
County of Tompkins v. Powers (New York Supreme Court 1964)
Barnathan v. Kramer (New York Supreme Court 1964)
Nehrbas v. Incorporated Village of Lloyd Harbor (N.Y. 1957)
In re the County of Monroe (N.Y. 1988)
County of Nassau v. South Farmingdale Water District (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1978)
Town of Hempstead v. Village of Rockville Centre (New York Supreme Court 1971)
City of Rochester v. Town of Rush (New York Supreme Court 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We do not pass upon the question of whether buildings, other than the one specified in the complaint, would be a violation of the zoning ordinance referred to. It is sufficient for this appeal to say the *552 injunction should be limited to the building mentioned in the complaint. To this extent the town should be enjoined.

The judgment appealed from, therefore, should be modified as stated in this memorandum, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs to either party.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.

Judgment modified.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.