Pocahontas Tanning Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance
Pocahontas Tanning Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance
154 N.E. 640; 243 N.Y. 644; 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 943
(North Eastern Reporter)
Pocahontas Tanning Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground plaintiff’s alleged loss was not covered by policy.
Concurring Opinion
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground plaintiff's alleged loss was not covered by policy.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ. *Page 645
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.