New York Court of Appeals, 1926

People Ex Rel. Rutland Railroad v. State Tax Commission

People Ex Rel. Rutland Railroad v. State Tax Commission
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 8, 1926 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
154 N.E. 597; 243 N.Y. 543; 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 809 (North Eastern Reporter)

People Ex Rel. Rutland Railroad v. State Tax Commission

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We do not consider what effect, if any, chapter 180 of the Laws of 1810 and chapter 257 of the Laws of 1824 might have upon the conclusion reached by us. The case was not tried upon the theory that either statute was material, nor is such a claim argued before us by the Attorney-General.

His cock, Ch. J., Carúozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.