New York Court of Appeals, 1927

Hammer v. Michael

Hammer v. Michael
New York Court of Appeals · Decided January 18, 1927
155 N.E. 895; 244 N.Y. 556; 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 1086 (North Eastern Reporter)

Hammer v. Michael

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur. (See 243 N. Y. 445.)

Motion granted, without costs. Return of remittitur requested and when returned the same will be amended by adding a provision that defendant have judgment against plaintiff for the return of his deposit of one thousand dollars, with interest from date of payment thereof.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.