McAvoy v. Schramme
McAvoy v. Schramme
157 N.E. 863; 245 N.Y. 575; 1927 N.Y. LEXIS 739
(North Eastern Reporter)
McAvoy v. Schramme
Opinion of the Court
The provision of the contract that payment to the attorney shall be made in cash, though the property received by the client may be something other than cash, is inconsistent with an intention to make an equitable assignment.
The judgment should be affirmed with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, etc.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.