Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner
Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner
164 N.E. 564; 249 N.Y. 510; 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 835
(North Eastern Reporter)
Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner
Opinion of the Court
The order was affirmed upon the ground that there was no clear legal duty on the part of the Borough President to remove bungalows from streets which had not yet been regulated and opened to the public.
The motion for reargument should be denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.