Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner

New York Court of Appeals
Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner, 164 N.E. 564 (N.Y. 1928)
249 N.Y. 510; 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 835
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>

Matter of Tompkins v. Bruckner

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The order was affirmed upon the ground that there was no clear legal duty on the part of the Borough President to remove bungalows from streets which had not yet been regulated and opened to the public.

The motion for reargument should be denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of Mary H. Tompkins Et Al., Appellants, Against Henry Bruckner, as President of the Borough of the Bronx, New York City, Respondent
Status
Published