New York Court of Appeals, 1928

Sugg v. Wandling

Sugg v. Wandling
New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 31, 1928 · <italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
166 N.E. 307; 250 N.Y. 517; 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1005 (North Eastern Reporter)

Sugg v. Wandling

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The findings of fact support the conclusions of law made at Special Term. There are no exceptions whatever to these findings or conclusions. There are no requests to find. There are no exceptions to the admission or rejection of evidence which deserve consideration. Under these circumstances we cannot consider the questions which the appellant seeks to raise before us.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.