Cahill v. Haff
Cahill v. Haff
164 N.E. 564; 249 N.Y. 509; 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 833
(North Eastern Reporter)
Opinion of the Court
Motion to amend remittitur so as to authorize application forthwith to a Special Term of the Supreme Court for the entry of an interlocutory decree in accordance with the terms of the remittitur, granted. (See 248 N. Y. 377.)
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.