Federal International Banking Company v. Touche
New York Court of Appeals
Federal International Banking Company v. Touche, 162 N.E. 507 (N.Y. 1928)
248 N.Y. 517; 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1309
Federal International Banking Company v. Touche
Opinion of the Court
In each action order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered in the negative. Held, that section 50, subdivision 1, of the Civil Practice Act, in so far as it prescribes a limitation in actions to recover damages for malpractice, refers to actions to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from the misconduct of physicians, surgeons and others practicing a profession similar to those enumerated.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Federal International Banking Company, Respondent, v. George A. Touche Et Al., Copartners Under the Firm Name of Touche, Niven & Co., Defendants, and John B. Niven Et Al., Appellants; Equitable Trust Company of Baltimore, Respondent, v. George A. Touche Et Al., Copartners Under the Firm Name of Touche, Niven & Co., Defendants, and John B. Niven Et Al., Appellants; Ultramares Corporation, Respondent, v. George A. Touche Et Al., Copartners Under the Firm Name of Touche, Niven & Co., Defendants, and John B. Niven Et Al., Appellants
- Cited By
- 9 cases
- Status
- Published